Dividend Kings
An even longer streak than Aristocrats β what sets Dividend Kings apart.
β±οΈ ~5 min read
Key Takeaways
- 'Dividend Kings' refers to companies with 50 or more consecutive years of annual dividend increases
- This is a longer streak requirement than Dividend Aristocrats (25 years), making Kings a smaller group
- Dividend Kings have maintained increase streaks through numerous major economic events over the decades
- As with Aristocrats, a long streak reflects history, not a guarantee of future dividend policy
What the term refers to
'Dividend Kings' is a term used to describe companies that have increased their dividend payment annually for 50 or more consecutive years. This is a considerably longer streak requirement than the 25-year threshold associated with Dividend Aristocrats (covered in the previous lesson), making the group of Dividend Kings notably smaller β and unlike the Aristocrats, the 'Dividend Kings' term isn't tied to a single official index in the same way, though it's widely used and tracked by various financial publications and data providers.
What a 50-year streak represents
A company with 50 consecutive years of dividend increases has maintained that policy through numerous significant economic events β multiple recessions, periods of high inflation, financial crises, and various market cycles β spanning multiple decades. This extended track record is sometimes cited as an indicator of a particularly durable business model and a strong organizational commitment to returning capital to shareholders, even during periods that would have tested many companies' financial flexibility.
Example: Putting 50 years in context
A company that has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years as of today would have started that streak roughly five decades ago β meaning the streak has persisted through multiple distinct economic downturns, each of which posed its own challenges to corporate profitability and cash flow.
This doesn't mean the company's business has been unaffected by these events β many companies with such streaks have still experienced periods of slower earnings growth β but it does mean the dividend itself continued to be increased (even if only modestly in some years) throughout.
How Kings relate to Aristocrats
Every Dividend King, by definition, also meets the 25-year increase streak that defines a Dividend Aristocrat β Kings are a subset with an even longer streak. However, not every Dividend King is necessarily included in the formal S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats index, since that index has additional requirements (S&P 500 membership, minimum size, and liquidity) that a Dividend King might not meet β for example, if it's not a member of the S&P 500 index at all.
What the label doesn't tell you
As with Dividend Aristocrats, a 50-year increase streak describes history and doesn't guarantee the streak will continue β a company's circumstances can change at any point. Additionally, the size of the dividend increases over a streak can vary considerably β some companies might increase their dividend by a token amount (e.g., a fraction of a cent per share) in some years specifically to maintain the streak, which is a different situation than a company making substantial, meaningful increases each year. Looking at the actual growth rate of the dividend over time β not just the existence of a streak β provides additional context.
Using these labels in research
Both 'Dividend Aristocrat' and 'Dividend King' labels can serve as a useful starting point for identifying companies with long histories of returning capital to shareholders in a particular way β but as with any single criterion, they work best as part of a broader research process that also considers the company's current financial health, valuation, payout ratio, and business outlook.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are all Dividend Kings large, well-known companies?+
Many are well-established companies, though the Dividend Kings group includes companies of varying sizes and from varying industries β the defining criterion is the length of the increase streak, not the company's size, industry, or current yield.
Does a longer streak mean a higher yield?+
Not necessarily β streak length (years of consecutive increases) and yield (annual dividend relative to price) are different characteristics. A company could have a very long streak with a relatively modest current yield, or vice versa.
What happens if a Dividend King's streak is broken?+
If a company fails to increase its dividend in a given year (or cuts it), it would no longer meet the Dividend King criteria for that year going forward β it would need to build a new qualifying streak (50+ years) to requalify, which would take a very long time, effectively meaning the label would not apply again for the foreseeable future under the standard definition.